Of course, the popularization of this process has the potential to drastically change society as we know it. It would impact ethical and moral ideas about the conception of babies, children who have predetermined characteristics, and parents responsible for selecting these traits. It could become a common procedure done by almost anyone (even those who disagreed at first, due to pressure from others). Wouldn’t it be odd to have baby books with spaces for lists of traits chosen for you and the name of the scientist who engineered you? This may seem far-fetched now, but it’s realistic to say that in the next few decades, this could become true to life.
I think designer babies would suffer emotionally. I think they’d question their parents' love for them and feel increased pressure to live up to standards made for them before they were conceived. Even if their genetic makeup was chosen in order to benefit someone else, there could still be emotional distress involved. For example, the novel My Sister's Keeper by Jodi Picoult expressed feelings of a (fictional) designer baby, Anna, who struggles with being designed to save her sister, having limited control over her body because of this and feelings of guilt when she wishes to discontinue procedures. Parents may be doing such things in the best interest of their children, but is it worth it when their children are likely to be hurt anyways? I think not.
Sources:
- http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/life/genetic/designer-children.htm
- http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/genetics/article6978400.ece
- http://www.buzzle.com/articles/pros-and-cons-of-designer-babies.html
- http://www.abc.net.au/btn/story/s2515351.htm
- http://www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/agar.html
- (Click images for their sources)
My comments can be found on these entries: